Summary

of Nonlinear Existentialism

It appears that any effort to formally define what it is to be human is destined to a well meant stupor as the result of our inability to be completely objective. Overspecialization of our sciences, and the concurrent isolation of what is and is not possible, causes those who measure the world too closely, to lose sight of the answers they already have. Immanuel Kant, one of the predecessors of Existentialism, a person’s whose writings directly affected Søren Kierkegaard, the father of this branch of philosophy, was well aware that we are limited beings due our inaccurate senses. However, he did not allow himself to be completely overwhelmed by apparent restrictions of realism, and believed that there was a way of bridging the gap between it and idealism. To overcome this chiasm, Kant believed that we had transcendental abilities which would allow us to arrive at information beyond the limitations of our empirical experiences. Nevertheless, while he deduced that in order for a person to interact with the environment the body has to have the inherent ability to create the phenomena of time, as well as the ability to understand and recreate external patterns inside of ourselves as a product of synthetic knowledge, Kant did not consider biology, and he certainly did not define Thought, as Nonlinear Existentialism does, as: a destabilizing, cortically derived, electro-magnetic event that increases the probability of optimizing the energy signals associated with sensory input. As offered in the previous sections of this website, the most objective viewpoint is the one that appears to accept that we can only find truth through variance. Even though observation and measurement of an object allows a person to copy something in front of themselves, reality can only be appreciated and put into a wider scope if it is felt by a mind that actually feels its own fluctuations. Having completed the beginnings of a global theory to explain those traits, aptitudes and misunderstandings that are unique to humanity, an exercise that can be surely improved upon, the next sections involves the further application of these theories. Before proceeding, I am including a link to a paper entitled: Development of Non-Optimal Wants Baseline Activity Level and an Overview of Neurobiological Correlates relating to Nonlinear Existentialism. Up to this point, the intention has to been to offer a number of divergent reasons for the possible existence of variation in the cerebral cortex. As such, associating this reinterpretation to specific parts of the brain has been limited to only Layer VIb of the Cerebral Cortex. Given that the building blocks have been complete, this last paper places its own template on the central nervous system. In the overview entitled: Correlation Between Neuronal Energy, Interference to Signal Relationships and Human Functionality and its accompanying diagram. I offer another way of considering Nonlinear Existentialism in a simpler form.  And finally is the summary document Separation and Integration, Version III (Updated 2020); it is a complete overview of Nonlinear  Existentialism, including those topics discussed on YouTube. The treatise is brief, and summarizes all salient points of the thesis in approximately sixty (60) propositions.